One of the best (if not ‘the best’) pieces I’ve come across on the ludicrousness of cissexist TERF attitudes towards trans people using public toilets. The writer notes: “As a cis woman, bathroom bills terrify me, as all it takes is someone deciding my hairy arms mean I should have the contents of my knickers checked. I’m not even the primary target of these bills, nor would I be most at risk from the violences inherent in such bills. Those most at risk are, of course, trans women: it’s yet another avenue for increasing the risk of victimhood to a group who are already far more at risk of becoming victims of sexual or violent crimes.”
Content warning: this post discusses transmisogyny, transphobia and sexual violence
A bill that would empower people to inspect your genitals on demand came one step closer to being law across the pond yesterday. Calls for such legislation are becoming increasingly popular, because of transmisogyny.
How bathroom bills work is like this:
- People must use bathrooms that fit with their genitals.
- The ladies’ bathroom is actually for people with vaginas, the gents’ for people with penises.
- However, nobody is proposing changing the names of the bathrooms to make this clearer because they’re cissexist pigs.
- Anyway, it’s illegal for people with penises to use the ladies’ and people with vaginas to use the gents’
- SOMEHOW END RAPE AND KEEP WOMEN SAFE
Make no mistake. The entire rationale behind bathroom bills is rooted in transmisogyny. It’s a neat little way of excluding trans women from public life by denying them access to…
View original post 511 more words